J. E. BALLARD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and” adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby reversed on authority of Smith v. State, decided at this term of Court.
Ellis, C.'J.,. and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Motor Lines, Inc. v. Bradley, 121 Fla. 591 (Fla. 1935)…ther forty may be considered as abandoned. See: Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Watkins, 97 Fla. 350, 121 So. 95; Burnett v. Green, 97 Fla. 1007, 122 So. 570; McWilliams Co. v. Travers, 96 Fla. 203, 118 So. 54; McClure v. Century Estates, 96 Fla. 568, 119 So. 146; Kloss v. State, 95 Fla. 433, 116 So. 39; Denmark v. State, 95 Fla. 757, 116 So. 757. The practice of assigning a large and unnecessary number of errors is disapproved. See: Hoopes v. Crane, 56 Fla. 395, 47 So. 992; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Wh…
-
Vazquez v. State, 405 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…954); Sparkman v. State Prison Custodian, 154 Fla. 688, 18 So. 2d 772 (1944); Clinton v. State, 143 Fla. 356, 196 So. 684 (1940); Coulson v. State, 110 Fla. 279, 149 So. 521 (1933); Timmons v. State, 97 Fla. 23, 119 So. 393 (1929); Ballard v. State, 96 Fla. 566, 119 So. 146 (1928). Contra, Hall v. State, 400 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). . “In the circumstances of this case we are impelled to conclude that denial of the defendant’s motion for severance of the offenses did not represent an abuse of discr…
-
State v. Ellis Dixon, 193 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)…, among other things, carry its burden of proving the prior conviction of Dixon of the felony of forgery, and such proof must be technical and specific. Smith v. State, 1928, 96 Fla. 553, 119 So. 145, followed in Ballard v. State, 1928, 96 Fla. 566, 119 So. 146; Timmons v. State, 1929, 97 Fla. 23, 119 So. 393; Coulson v. State, 1933, 110 Fla. 281, 149 So. 522; Clinton v. State, 1940, 143 Fla. 356, 196 So. 684; Sparkman v. State Prison Custodian, 1944, 154 Fla. 688, 18 So. 2d 772; and Warren v. State, Fla.1…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence