HAROLD RIGGENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HAROLD RIGGENS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
805 So. 2d 1082
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Atwater v. State, 788 So. 2d 223, 227 (Fla.2001) (“[Hjabeas corpus petitions are not to be used for additional appeals on questions which could have been, should have been, or were raised on appeal or in a rule 3.850 motion, or on matters that were not objected to at trial”) (quoting Parker v. Dugger, 550 So. 2d 459, 460 (Fla.1989)).
THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Koile v. State, 902 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…ivil obligation exists prior to sentencing. See Id. at 244. The mere fact that a lost wage claim may also be com-pensable civilly is not a bar to awarding such losses as part of restitution, provided the prerequisites are met. See State v. Williams, 805 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). As noted earlier, restitution requires findings by the tidal court that the loss or damage is causally connected to the offense, either directly or indirectly, and bears a significant relationship to the offense. See Bernard. H…
-
Medeiros v. State, 846 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…PER CURIAM. Habeas petitions cannot be used for additional appeals on questions which could have been, should have been, or were raised on appeal or in a rule 3.850 motion, or on matters that were not objected to at trial. See Riggens v. State, 805 So. 2d 1082 [*1221] (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (citing Parker v. Dugger, 550 So. 2d 459, 460 (Fla.1989)). AFFIRMED. THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- J.B. Parker v. Dugger, 550 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 1989)
- Atwater v. State, 788 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2001)