LARRY BORNEISEN, APPELLANT,
v.
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND HOME DEPOT, APPELLEES
LARRY BORNEISEN, APPELLANT,
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND HOME DEPOT, APPELLEES
806 So. 2d 542
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. Raysor v. Raysor, 706 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Coca Cola Foods v. Cordero, 589 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sostchin v. Doll Enters., Inc., 847 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…a. 5th DCA 2002); Schonfeld v. Albert Alpert & Sons, Ltd., 427 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Beverage Canners v. Cott Corp., 372 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Such an award cannot be based upon speculation or conjecture. Stensby v. Effjohn Oy Ab, 806 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Shadow Lakes, Inc. v. Cudlipp Const. and Development Co., Inc., 658 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Himes v. Brown & Co. Securities Corp., 518 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The term of the parties’ lease does not define the dura…
-
Telemundo Network, Inc. v. Spanish Television Servs., Inc., 812 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…damage4 — this kind of argument simply cannot be effectively cured by “rebuke nor retraction [which would] entirely destroy [its] sinister influence.” [e.s.] Baggett v. Davis, 124 Fla. 701, 717, 169 So. 372, 379 (1936). See Stensby v. Effjohn Oy Ab, 806 So. 2d 542, 544 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(no abuse of discretion to grant new trial on grounds of “the inexcusable [though unobjected to] intimation of religious prejudice on the part of the defendants. See Murphy v. International Robotic Sys. Inc., 766 So. 2d 1…
-
Katz Deli OF Aventura, Inc. v. Waterways Plaza, LLC, 183 So. 3d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…e established with a reasonable degree.of certainty and must be a natural consequence of the wrong.” Sostchin, 847 So. 2d at 1128 (internal citations omitted). The projected profits cannot be mere speculation or conjecture, Stensby v. Effjohn Oy Ab, 806 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), but the inability to prove a precise damages amount will not prevent a plaintiff from recovering so long as it is clear that some loss resulting from the defendant’s actions is certain. Ardell v. Milner, 166 So. 2d 714, 716 (Fla.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Raysor v. Raysor, 706 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- Coca Cola Foods & GAB v. Olivo Cordero, 589 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)