JESSIE WOODALL, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• McCANTS v. McCANTS, 984 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …support an imputation of income or that the husband actually earned that amount. The court remanded for the trial court to reconsider the husband’s income and to reconsider the alimony and child support awards. Id. at 437; see also LaSala v. LaSala, 806 So. 2d 602, 603-04 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (determining that error in calculating the husband’s current net income required reversal and remand for reconsideration of alimony, child support, and attorney’s fees). The Third District in Rodriguez also noted that the…
• Smith v. State, 830 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
  …laims that proper jail time credit was not awarded to him for the time he served in North Carolina. This claim is successive and the trial court’s denial of the previous Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion was affirmed in Smith v. State, 806 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). AFFIRMED. HARRIS, PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.…
• Waldera v. Waldera, 45 Fla. L. Weekly D47 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
  …me from a non-recurring source. Even if this was the proper characterization of such income, it failed to rebut the presumption of continued ability to earn. Compare Mata v. Mata, 185 So. 3d 1271, 1272-73 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), with LaSala v. LaSala, 806 So. 2d 602, 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). If a court’s determination of income is erroneous where “there was no evidence that the husband’s income in 1997, which was substantially greater than his average income for the preceding three years, would continue,” Lauro…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987)