SPEEDLINE U.S.A., INC., APPELLANT,

v.

NSU, III, INC., AS ASSIGNEE OF 671 WASHINGTON AVENUE CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-01-16

No. 3D00-3497

Before GODERICH and GREEN, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

807 So. 2d 101 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002) Positive Treatment

Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Camp v. Paul N. Howard Co., 853 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)

…indemnity, the terms of the agreement will determine whether the indemnitor is obligated to reimburse the indemnitee for a particular claim. See Dade County School Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638 (Fla.1999); Arison v. Cobb Partners, Ltd., 807 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); ICA Const. Corp. v. Fredrick R. Harris, Inc., 701 So. 2d 113, 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Howard is also wrong in its contention that under no reading of paragraph 6.30 could it be said that Howard is contractually bound to provide…

1 / 2
Highwoods Props., Inc. v. Millar Elevator Serv. Co. & Schindler Elevator Co., 247 So. 3d 639 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)

…was Voluntary In point (2) of the final order, the trial court held Highwoods could not seek indemnification from Schindler for its voluntary $510,000 payment, which was made without any legal obligation to pay. See Arison v. Cobb Partners, Ltd. , 807 So. 2d 101, 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). We reject this conclusion as premature at this juncture. First, it contradicts the reasoning in point (4) of the final order in which the trial court found the summary judgment order was improperly entered where Schindler ha…
Highwoods Props., Inc. v. Milar Elevator Serv. Co. & Schindler Elevator Co. (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw