OZA B. JENKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
UNIVERSAL AMERICAN MORTGAGE COMPANY, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Oza B. Jenkins appeals from a final order granting foreclosure in favor of Universal American Mortgage Company (Universal). Ms. Jenkins, based on her own calculations, argued below that she was not behind in her monthly mortgage payments, and that Universal actually owed her money because she had been overpaying for several .years. However, a review of the mortgage and loan modification agreement clearly indicates that Ms. Jenkins’s calculations were incorrect. As such, in the absence of any valid defense, the trial court properly entered judgment in favor of Universal. See GE Capital Mortgage Servs., Inc. v. Canales, 691 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomas v. State, 825 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)…Johnson is distinguishable from the instant situation. Here, the appellant does not challenge his original adult sentence. Rather, the appellant challenges his new sentence imposed following successful completion of boot camp. We find Sada v. State, 807 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), persuasive. As the appellant, Sada was not initially sentenced under the youthful offender statute. However, he was classified as a youthful offender by the Department of Corrections, received trial court approval to attend boot…
-
Oza B. Jenkins v. Lennar Corp. & Duane Morris & Heckscher, 972 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…foreclosure entered against her in a December 2000 lawsuit brought by Universal American Mortgage Company (“Universal”), a subsidiary of Lennar. In 2002, this Court affirmed that final judgment of foreclosure. Jenkins v. Universal Am. Mortgage Co., 807 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Jenkins pursued her appeal to the Florida Supreme Court, and shortly thereafter, to the United States Supreme Court, but was denied certiorari on both occasions. In 2004, Jenkins sued Universal and a host of other entities in st…
-
Adderly v. State, 958 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)…Emphasis added). Because Adderly successfully completed DOC’s boot camp program, the trial court has a clear legal duty to comply with the provisions of this statute by modifying Ad-derly’s sentence to a term of probation. See, e.g., Sada v. State, 807 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Smith v. State, 750 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). We note that section 958.045(5)(c), Florida Statutes, was amended effective July 1, 2006, and now provides that a youthful offender who violates the probationary term imposed f…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- GE Cap. Mortg. Servs., Inc. v. Maguy Canales, 691 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)