WARREN DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-02-13
No. 3D01-1646
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
807 So. 2d 166 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 120 S.Ct. 673, 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000)(flight factor in determining founded suspicion); United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266, 122 S.Ct. 744, 151 L.Ed.2d 740 (2002)(all circumstances pertinent in determining founded suspicion); State v. May nard, 783 So. 2d 226 (Fla.2001); Popple v. State, 626 So. 2d 185 (Fla.1993).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Teofilo Bermudez Centano v. State, 880 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
    …be both willful and substantial in nature, and must be supported by the greater weight of the evidence”). Our case law requires an appropriate written order revoking the defendant’s probation based upon the evidence presented. See Watson v. State, 807 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). While the failure of the trial court to render a written order is sufficient to require reversal, we further conclude here that the combination of the piecemeal concessions made by the State as this violation proceeding has progr…
  • Burt v. State, 931 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
    …lant’s community control listing the conditions that were violated. Thus, we reverse the trial court to the extent that it must prepare a written order on the violations on remand. Rucker v. State, 890 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Watson v. State, 807 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded. . Defendant cites Nelson v. State, 753 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), where the court held that a defendant's visit to a pawn shop at 5:20 p.m., when he was permitted to rem…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw