KEVIN A. STAGL, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES E. BRIDGERS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a dismissal for failure to state a cause of action, without more, does not automatically justify an award of attorney's fees under section 57.105.
Appellant challenged an order awarding attorney's fees to appellee pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes. Appellant's complaint had been dismis…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Failure To State A Cause Of Action cases and more on FLexlaw
STRINGER, Judge.
Appellant, Kevin A. Stagl, challenges the trial court’s order awarding appellee, James E. Bridgers, attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1997). We reverse.
An award of attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105 is appropriate only when the action is “so clearly devoid of merit both on the facts and the law as to be completely untenable.” Brinson v. Creative Aluminum Prods., 519 So. 2d 59, 60 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
Here, Stagl’s complaint was dismissed three times for failure to state a cause of action. The last such dismissal was with prejudice. However, merely failing to state a cause of action is not sufficient, in and of itself, to support a finding that the claim was so lacking in merit as to justify an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105. See Strothman v. Henderson Mental Health Ctr., Inc., 425 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). The record before us does not support the trial court’s finding that there was a complete absence of a justiciable issue of fact or law.
Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the order which awards attorney’s fees in the amount of $34,365.50. We, however, affirm those portions of the order which award previous appellate costs in the amount. of $211.35 pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400 and court costs in the amount of $2,810.75 pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420.
Reversed in part and affirmed in part.
BLUE, C.J., and COVINGTON, J., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marcellus M. Mason, Jr. v. Highlands Cnty. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs, 817 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…pleadings. 410 So. 2d at 505-06. Failing to state a cause of action is not, in and of itself, a sufficient basis to support a finding that a claim was so lacking in merit as to justify an award of fees pursuant to section 57.105. Stagl v. Bridget, 807 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). In Stagl, the complaint had been dismissed three times for failure to state a cause of action, but the record on appeal did not support the trial court’s finding that there was a complete absence of a justiciable issue of law or…
-
Fortner v. State, 830 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…entence and remand for resentencing under a corrected scoresheet. All defendants are entitled to be sentenced under a correctly scored and calculated scoresheet. See Carter v. State, 705 So .2d 582, 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). See also Walker v. State, 807 So. 2d 177, 178 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Collins v. State, 788 So. 2d 1109, 1109 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Here, Fortner correctly contends that his prior convictions were improperly scored. The judgments used by the State to score Fortner’s prior record reflect that For…
-
Martin Cnty. Conservation Alliance & 1000 Friends of Fla., Inc. v. Martin Cnty., 73 So. 3d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…e application of the statute of limitations, it reversed an order imposing sanctions under section 57.105(1) “because the Appellant’s claim was arguably supported by material facts and then-existing law” (emphasis added); see also Stagl v. Bridgers, 807 So. 2d 177, 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (“An award of attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105 is appropriate only when the action is ‘so clearly devoid of merit both on the facts and the law as to be completely untenable.’ ”) (quoting Brinson v. Creative Aluminu…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Strothman v. Henderson Mental Health Ctr., Inc., 425 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
- Hilde W. Brinson v. Creative Aluminum Prods., Inc., 519 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)