CRAIG PARHAM, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CRAIG PARHAM, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
807 So. 2d 191
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Black v. State, 664 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), review dismissed, 670 So. 2d 937 (Fla.1996).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Santo Anthony Dileo, Sr. v. Dileo, 939 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…ime to prepare for a contested hearing. See Harreld v. Harreld, 682 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Certainly the same is true of civil contempt hearings in the family law context. See Woolf v. Woolf, 901 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Paul v. Paul, 807 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 865 So. 2d 1277 (Fla.2004). Mr. Dileo was entitled to proper notice both of the hearing on the motion for contempt and the show cause hearing, as well as adequate time to prepare for each. Here, the record simp…
-
Paul v. Paul, 865 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 2004)…PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Paul v. Paul, 807 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), a decision which the district court of appeal certified to be in direct conflict with the decision of another district court pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have…
-
Pernas v. Poggi, 983 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…e appellee’s motion to vacate a previously entered final judgment. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b); Viets v. Am. Recruiters Enters., Inc., 922 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Paul v. Paul, 807 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 865 So. 2d 1277 (Fla.2004). Affirmed. SUAREZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge, concur.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Black v. State, 664 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)