CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AND JOHNS EASTERN COMPANY, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
ZEILTER MCGILL, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2001-12-31
No. 1D00-4530
PADOVANO, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
807 So. 2d 686 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2001)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The City of West Palm Beach and Johns Eastern Company appealed a workers' compensation order regarding calculation of offsets, payment of benefits, medical treatment, and penalties. The appellate court reversed penalties for underpayment of compensation benefits and nonpayment of temporary partial benefits, but affirmed other issues.


Holding

The court reversed the penalties for underpayment of compensation benefits because the JCC failed to set forth ultimate facts to support the penalty award. The court also reversed penalties for nonpayment of temporary partial benefits because competent, substantial evidence did not support the JCC's imposition of penalties when the E/SA had properly filed Notices of Denial within 21 days as required by statute.


Headnotes

[1] A workers' compensation judge's order imposing penalties must set forth the ultimate facts upon which the penalties are based.

[2] A workers' compensation employer/servant's attorney must file a Notice of Denial within 21 days of its knowledge of a claim to avoid penalties for nonpayment of benefits.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The JCC's order must set forth the ultimate facts upon which the penalties are based.”

Establishes the legal requirement for JCC orders to include factual findings, not just legal citations

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The JCC (Judge of Compensation Claims) issued an order concerning workers' compensation matters including calculation of a Grice offset, payment of un…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*687] PER CURIAM.

The City of West Palm Beach and Johns Eastern Company, Inc. (E/SA) appeal the JCC’s order concerning the calculation of the Grice offset, the payment of the underpayment in full without offset of a simultaneous overpayment with penalties, the psychiatric treatment with either Dr. Calo-brisi or Dr. Seminario, the payment of unpaid medical bills, and the award of penalties for nonpayment of temporary partial benefits. We reverse the imposition of penalties on the underpayment of compensation benefits and the nonpayment of temporary partial benefits. We affirm on all other issues on appeal without further discussion.

The E/SA argues on appeal that the JCC failed to make any findings of fact to substantiate the award of penalties on the underpayment of benefits. We agree. The JCC’s order must set forth the ultimate facts upon which the penalties are based. See Davis v. Broward County Health Dep’t, 570 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Here, the JCC merely cited McClure v. Goldman, Klasfeld, Horkey, and Ferraro, 594 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), as support for imposing penalties. This was insufficient as the JCC did not include any ultimate facts apart from the citation. Therefore, we reverse the imposition of penalties on the underpayment and remand to the JCC for a determination of penalties which includes the ultimate facts upon which the determination is based.

The E/SA next contends that the JCC erred in imposing penalties on the nonpayment of temporary partial benefits. It claims that it properly filed Notices of Denial on the claims for temporary partial benefits. Section 440.20(7), Florida Statutes (1991) provides for the assessment of a penalty if an installment of benefits is not paid within 14 days after it becomes due unless the E/SA files a Notice of Denial or the nonpayment results from conditions beyond the control of the E/SA. Section 440.20(6), Florida Statutes (1991), requires the E/SA to file its Notice of Denial within 21 days of its knowledge of the claim. Competent, substantial evidence does not exist in the record to support the JCC’s imposition of penalties. The record contains evidence that the E/SA controverted within 21 days the claimant’s requests for temporary partial benefits for the time periods in question. Therefore, we reverse the assessment of penalties for the nonpayment of temporary partial benefits.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED with directions.

PADOVANO, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw