CLARENCE ZACKE, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL MOORE, RESPONDENT
CLARENCE ZACKE, PETITIONER,
MICHAEL MOORE, RESPONDENT
808 So. 2d 270
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law by denying the petitioner’s request for mandamus relief without affording him the opportunity to reply to the respondent below. See Jones v. Singletary, 709 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Bard v. Wolson, 687 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Accordingly, the circuit court’s order denying the petition for writ of mandamus is quashed, and this case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. We note that the petitioner’s count for declaratory judgment remains pending in the circuit court.
WOLF, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bard v. Wolson, 687 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
- Jones v. State, 709 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- Jones v. Singletary, 709 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)