MICHAEL SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2002-02-26
No. 5D01-1633
THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.
808 So. 2d 276 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Trotter v. State, 801 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Olivo v. State, 823 So. 2d 872 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
    …y limits the executive function of the prosecution. The first and fourth districts have considered and rejected these arguments. Bass v. State, 816 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Nelson v. State, 811 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Dukes v. State, 808 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Jackson v. State, 795 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Hagan v. State, 793 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Green v. State, 792 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), rev. denied, 817 So. 2d 847 (Fla.2002).3 We adopt their views on thes…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw