ROBERT MCKEEVER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Heggs V. State Resentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
[*287] PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, in which he claims to be entitled to resentencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000). The appellant raised this exact issue in an earlier rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, the summary denial of which this Court per curiam affirmed. See McKeever v. State, 795 So. 2d 63 (table)(Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Because the appeal of the earlier 3.850 motion was pending before this Court when the trial court ruled on this identical issue, the trial court was without jurisdiction. See Bates v. State, 704 So. 2d 562, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). We accordingly reverse the trial court’s summary denial of the appellant’s motion and remand for the trial court to dismiss the appellant’s motion. See Williams v. State, 795 So. 2d 975, 976 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
BOOTH, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thompson v. Awnclean USA, Inc., 849 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…E within the $400 limit established by the legislature. Thus, they do not have a claim that enforcing the legislative directive would deprive them of their constitutional right to a presentation of their case. See Alpizar v. Star Styled Dancing Co., 808 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Finally, this record contains no support for the $1,000 charge proposed by the doctor to accommodate the presence of a court reporter at the examination. No evidence demonstrates that the additional charge requested by the doct…
-
Betts v. State, 829 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)…ion, the denial of which was pending in this Court at the time the trial court ruled on the third motion, the trial court was without jurisdiction to rule on this third motion. Darling v. State, 799 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); McKeever v. State, 808 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Under such circumstances, the trial court was required to dismiss the appellant’s third motion for lack of jurisdiction. See id. The appellant’s fourth motion does not raise related claims but is untimely and an abuse of process…
-
DeCUBA v. Indian River Cmty. Coll. & Gallagher Bassett Servs., Inc., 867 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…d, thus, the fee cap applied. Because Dr. Davidson violated that statutory cap on fees, he is disqualified as an individual from testifying as an independent medical examiner at any time in Appellant’s case. See Alpizar v. Star Styled Dancing Co., 808 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); City of Riviera Beach v. Napier, 791 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Accordingly, Dr. Davidson remains disqualified under the statute as amended, regardless of what he charged for the second IME, or what he may charge for any f…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000)
- Bates v. State, 704 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- Clark v. State, 795 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)