FAIRBANKS CAPITAL CORPORATION, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
LISA L. ZIOL; THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF LISA L. ZIOL; AND ALL UNKNOWN PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER, AND AGAINST THE HEREIN NAMED INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT(S) WHO ARE NOT KNOWN TO BE DEAD OR ALIVE, WHETHER SAID UNKNOWN PARTIES MAY CLAIM AN INTEREST AS SPOUSES, HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES, OR OTHER CLAIMANTS; ASSOCIATES HOME EQUITY SERVICES, INC.; TENANT # 1, TENANT # 2, TENANT # 3 AND TENANT #4 THE NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS TO ACCOUNT FOR PARTIES IN POSSESSION, APPELLEES
FAIRBANKS CAPITAL CORPORATION, INC., APPELLANT,
LISA L. ZIOL; THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF LISA L. ZIOL; AND ALL UNKNOWN PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER, AND AGAINST THE HEREIN NAMED INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT(S) WHO ARE NOT KNOWN TO BE DEAD OR ALIVE, WHETHER SAID UNKNOWN PARTIES MAY CLAIM AN INTEREST AS SPOUSES, HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES, OR OTHER CLAIMANTS; ASSOCIATES HOME EQUITY SERVICES, INC.; TENANT # 1, TENANT # 2, TENANT # 3 AND TENANT #4 THE NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS TO ACCOUNT FOR PARTIES IN POSSESSION, APPELLEES
808 So. 2d 1268
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s motion to vacate doesn’t show on its face that it is entitled to relief as a matter of law. We, accordingly, affirm the trial court’s order of dismissal.
AFFIRMED.
STONE, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bd. OF Trs. v. LEE, 189 So. 3d 120 (Fla. 2016)…. See Althouse v. Palm Beach Cty. Sheriff’s Office, 92 So. 3d 899, 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Greater Orlando Aviation Auth. v. Nejame, Lafay, Jancha, Vara, Barker, 4 So. 3d 41, 43 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); Knight Ridder, Inc. v. Dade Aviation Consultants, 808 So. 2d 1268, 1269 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). We have jurisdiction to resolve this conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.1 In accordance with ease law liberally construing the Public Records Act in favor of open access to public records, the reasonable statutory…
-
Althouse v. Palm Beach Cnty. Sheriff's Off., 92 So. 3d 899 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…a person is entitled to fees and costs under section 119.12, is a matter of law reviewed de novo and, per the statute, depends on whether the agency’s refusal was lawful.1 Instructive in this case is Knight Ridder Inc. v. Dade Aviation Consultants, 808 So. 2d 1268, 1270 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), which provides that “[ejntitlement to fees under the statute is based upon whether the public entity had a ‘reasonable’ or ‘good faith’ belief in the soundness of its position in refusing production.” [*902] In the instant…
-
Greater Orlando Aviation Auth. v. Nejame, 4 So. 3d 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)…from production. 49 C.F.R. § 26.67(a)(2)(v). Finally, we deny Nejame, Lafay’s request for attorney’s fees as we conclude that GOAA did not act unreasonably or in bad faith in refusing production. See Knight Ridder, Inc. v. Dade Aviation Consultants, 808 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); WFSH of Niceville v. City of Niceville, 422 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED. GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur. . Though styled as a complaint for injunctive relief, substantively…