JULIA KRONFELD, APPELLANT,
v.
MARK KRONFELD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID KRONFELD, APPELLEE
JULIA KRONFELD, APPELLANT,
MARK KRONFELD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID KRONFELD, APPELLEE
809 So. 2d 85
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the Order on Remand and the Second Amended Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. The trial court properly gave “the husband credit for the money spent in paying off the corporate debt,” in keeping with this court’s mandate in Kronfeld v. Kronfeld, 761 So. 2d 411, 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Contrary to the wife’s argument here, the trial court’s distribution properly awards each spouse 50% of the marital assets and then deducts the husband’s credit from the wife’s share.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taurus Holdings, Inc. v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 913 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 2005)…licy exclusions with different language. Taurus nevertheless argues that applying the exclusion to encompass more than defective products may create gaps in insurance coverage, contrary to Florida public policy. See Farrer v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 809 So. 2d 85, 94 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (noting that “a comprehensive general liability policy should be construed as leaving no gap in coverage between it and an automobile policy”). Taurus reasons that if an insured wished to obtain total coverage and purchased a…
-
Discover Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Beach Cars OF W. Palm, Inc., 929 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…in favor of the insured and against their drafter, the insurer. Purrelli v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 698 So. 2d 618, 620 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Such a construction most typically will result in a finding of coverage. Farrer v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 809 So. 2d 85, 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). In considering Appellant’s argument, it is significant to note the primary cases on which it relies are instructive as to how an insurer should have drafted the policy language in this case. For example, it cites Makarka ex…
-
Mid-Continent Cas. Co. v. Royal Crane, LLC, 169 So. 3d 174 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…erage While similar, the first two required showings — the existence of coverage under the policy and the insurer’s duty to defend — are distinct in that the duty to defend is broader than the issue of coverage. See Farrer v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 809 So. 2d 85, 88 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). The insurer’s duty to defend arises solely from “ ‘the facts and legal theories alleged in [*181] the pleadings and claims against the insured.’” Stephens v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., 749 F. 3d 1318, 1323 (11th Cir.2014) (quot…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kronfeld v. Kronfeld, 761 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)