RICHARD S. HELMADOLLAR, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Bishop v. State, 899 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
  …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Brown v. State, 813 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Payton v. State, 810 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). SHARP, W., PETERSON and TORPY, JJ., concur.…
• Sasser v. State, 858 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
  …es of 70.3 months’ imprisonment. Because Appellant was sentenced as a habitual felony offender, it was proper for the trial court to refuse to reduce Appellant’s sentences in case number 99-4438. § 775.084(4)(h), Fla. Stat. (1999); Payton v. State, 810 So. 2d 539, 540 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). However, the trial court erred in refusing to resentence Appellant in accordance with the corrected scoresheet in case number 02-3308. Appellant must be sentenced between his Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet lowest permi…
• Longley v. State, 944 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …’t count. It does count, and a claim that the procedural requirements of the habitual offender statute were not followed is not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) proceeding. See Clayton v. State, 904 So. 2d 660, 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Payton v. State, 810 So. 2d 539, 540 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). It is far too late for Longley to file a rule 3.850 motion, to say nothing of the fact that it would be his fourth rule 3.850 motion if he did so. Third, we hold that Longley is barred from further pro se filings in this…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987)