CALVIN. L. WEEMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CALVIN. L. WEEMS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
810 So. 2d 966
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Jones v. State, 791 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
ERVIN, BARFIELD and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J.S.U.B., Inc. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 906 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…the trial court’s interpretation of the subject policies is de novo. Jones v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 463 So. 2d 1153, 1157 (Fla.1985); Bilt- [*307] more Constr. Co. v. Owners Ins. Co., 842 So. 2d 947, 949 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Vollmer v. Key Fin. Corp., 810 So. 2d 966, 968 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). We are required to construe an insurance policy in accordance with its plain language. Swire Pac. Holdings, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co., 845 So. 2d 161, 165 (Fla.2003). If the relevant policy language is susceptible to more than…
-
In re Guardianship OF Sara H. Sapp. Lee O'Hare & Lynn Atherton v. Lalai Hamric, 868 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…ttlement agreements are governed by contract law. Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So. 2d 1384, 1385 (Fla.1985); Schlosser v. Perez, 832 So. 2d 179, 182 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Therefore, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Vollmer v. Key Fin. Corp., 810 So. 2d 966, 968 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Kaplan v. Bayer, 782 So. 2d 417, 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). “It is well-settled that when entitlement to attorney’s fees is based on the interpretation of contractual provisions as a pure matter of law, an appellate court will…
-
Bethany Trace Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Whispering Lakes I, LLC, 155 So. 3d 1188 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)…t in favor of Watermen and Whispering Lakes, and the Association now seeks review. We review the trial court’s interpretation of a contract de novo. See Jackson v. Shakespeare Found., Inc., 108 So. 3d 587, 593 (Fla.2013); Vollmer v. Key Fin. Corp., 810 So. 2d 966, 968 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Because the interpretation of a contract is a question of law, this court may reach a construction or interpretation of the contract contrary to that of the trial court. See, e.g., Gemini Ventures of Tampa, Inc. v. Hamilton…
Authorities Cited
- Benny Jones v. State, 791 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
- Walker v. State, 791 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)