WAYMOND JOE GIBSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WAYMOND JOE GIBSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
810 So. 2d 1008
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002)
Caution
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant’s claim that Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993), entitles him to relief. This point is insufficiently pled. This affirmance is without prejudice to any right Appellant might have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion indicating where and how the record demonstrates that he is entitled to relief. See Holsworth v. State, 522 So. 2d 348 (Fla.1988).
STONE, WARNER, and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Marshall, 869 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…out by the law. Furthermore, since the defendant’s violation of probation triggered the resen-tencing, the defendant is not being sentenced for “precisely the same conduct” .... [Cites omitted]. Roberts, 644 So. 2d at 82. See also Aponte v. State, 810 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Atkins v. State, 787 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Hernandez v. State, 776 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). In the present case the trial court awarded Mr. Marshall a downward departure sentence after the violation of probation w…
-
Carrigan v. State, 873 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…admitted, unless he or she has previously been adjudged guilty, and impose any sentence which it might have originally imposed before placing the probationer'on probation or the offender into community control, (emphasis added). In Aponte v. State, 810 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), the Fourth District held that victim injury points could be assessed upon a violation of probation despite the fact such points were not assessed in connection with the original sentencing. The court explained that the original…
-
Street v. State, 899 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…ate reversal of an illegal sentence, a defendant is entitled to a de novo sentencing hearing, during which both the state and the defendant can put on additional evidence and raise issues regarding a defendant’s scoresheet anew. See Aponte v. State, 810 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Altman v. State, 756 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). In Mills, this court determined that the law of the case doctrine did not apply to preclude the defendant from challenging the validity of prior convictions used to calculate…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993)
- Holsworth v. State, 522 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 1988)