STEVEN M. POE, APPELLANT,
v.
SHELLY M. POE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A contemnor cannot be required to pay future support payments not yet due as a condition to purge civil contempt.
Steven Poe was found in contempt for failure to pay alimony and ordered to pay arrearages, future payments, and attorney's fees. He appealed the order…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ability To Pay cases and more on FLexlaw
POLEN, C.J.
Steven Poe appeals the circuit court’s post-judgment order finding him in contempt for failure to pay alimony and awarding his wife her attorney’s fees in connection with said proceeding. We affirm without comment the lower court’s contempt finding and its order requiring the immediate incarceration of Mr. Poe, until such contempt was purged by the payment of his support arrearages in full. We also affirm the lower court’s award of the wife’s attorney’s fees as an appropriate sanction where Mr. Poe’s conduct was found frivolous. Mettler v. Mettler, 569 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
However, we reverse that portion of the order which requires Mr. Poe to timely make future support payments as they come due as an additional purge condition. In a civil contempt proceeding the contemnor must have the present ability to pay the purge amount. Accordingly, a contemnor cannot be required to pay amounts not yet due in order to purge himself of contempt. Roberts v. Roberts, 328 So. 2d 461, 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
Hence, we affirm the lower court’s contempt finding and award of attorney’s fees. We reverse and remand with directions for the circuit court to strike that portion of the contempt order which requires as a purge provision the timely payment of future support obligations as they come due.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.
HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Davies v. Davies, 824 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)…PER CURIAM. In this consolidated appeal from post-dissolution orders entered by the trial court, we affirm the trial court’s award of attorney’s fee entitlement as a sanction in the contempt proceeding. See, e.g., Poe v. Poe, 811 So. 2d 789, 789-90 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Becker v. Becker, 778 So. 2d 438, 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Worthington v. Harty, 677 So. 2d 1371, 1371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Mettler v. Mettler, 569 So. 2d 496, 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). We find, however, that appellant sh…
Authorities Cited
- Mettler v. Mettler, 569 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- Yanks v. Amerifirst Bank, 569 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
- Roberts v. Roberts, 328 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)