CHARLES E. ARNOLD; ROBERT L. ARNOLD, JR.; JULIAN ARNOLD; LOLLY ARNOLD; LUCILE C. ARNOLD; MELISSA ARNOLD; THOMAS R. ARNOLD; WILLIAM W. ARNOLD; WILLIAM W. ARNOLD, AS TRUSTEE; ALICE LUCILE SCHULTZ; JEAN R. BURN; JOSEPH L. CARRERE; JOHN F. CARRERE, JR.; MICHAEL L. CARRERE; CHARLES R. COLE, GEORGE T. COLE; RICHARD P. COLE; ALMERIA T. COTTINGHAM; LESLIE L. DE GALBERT; ELIZABETH FISH CARRERE TRUST; C. SHELDON LYKES EUSTIS; A.L. GEARY; ANN H. GOODHUE; JEAN B. GRACE; GRACE A. GRAPER; H-A ENERGY, LLC; JOSEPH H. HALE; SARAH HALE EAGLE; MARY A. HALE; WILLIAM L. HELFENSTEIN; CAROL MCKAY IRVIN; CARLA KELLY; ESTATE OF T. PAINE KELLY, III; JEAN B. KELLY; T. PAINE KELLY, JR.; HELEN T. KERR; LETITIA L. KNAPP; SHIRLEY L. KNIGHT; ALLISON LYKES; BONNIE LYKES; CMJJA, LTD.; FREDRICK E. LYKES; HEATHER LYKES; JOSEPH T. LYKES, III; TRUSTEE OF THE ANNE CHANDLER LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT; M. BRINTON LYKES; THOMPSON M. LYKES; TIMOTHY LYKES; WILLIAM T. LYKES; ANDREW K. MACFARLANE; HOWARD P. MACFARLANE; HUGH C. MACFARLANE, TRUSTEE OF JEAN STANLEY TRUST; HUGH C. MACFARLANE, JR.; SUE MACLAY; CHARLES A. MCKAY; SUNTRUST BANK AS TRUSTEE FOR HERBERT G. MCKAY REV. TRUST; HOWELL A. MCKAY; E.W. NETSCHER; KAY PEREZ; JOHN PINKERTON; TOM L. RANKIN; FREDERICA M. THOMPSON; SARAH M. WILEY; CATHRYN EHRLICH; HAZEL ALEXANDER; W.T. MORRIS, JR.; AND NANCY WOOTEN OLIVER AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF NANCY LYKES WOOTEN, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND; AND COASTAL PETROLEUM COMPANY, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed the denial of a motion for postconviction relief, but without prejudice to the defendant refiling a facially sufficient claim regarding ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to object to a sentencing scoresheet.
The court affirmed the denial of the postconviction relief motion without prejudice to Rankin filing a facially sufficient claim regarding the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel concerning the sentencing scoresheet.
Robert W. Rankin challenged the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, alleging that his substitute counsel was ineffective for faili…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellants’ response to the Court’s order of June 12, 2001, as well as the appellees’ replies thereto, the Court has determined that it does not have jurisdiction to review the order on appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellants’ request for review by petition for writ of certiorari is denied, and the appellants’ request for expedited treatment of the appeal is denied as moot.
BOOTH, WOLF, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.