MICHAEL O'SHIELDS, APPELLANT,

v.

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jiminez v. Faccone, 98 So. 3d 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)
  …ion was “obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake”; thus, it is binding upon the parties. See Johnson v. Johnson, 663 So. 2d 663, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); see also Esch v. Forster, 123 Fla. 905, 168 So. 229, 231-32 (1936); O’Neill v. O’Neill, 812 So. 2d 448, 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (“A court will enforce a stipulation unless good cause is shown, especially where parties have acted in reliance on the stipulation.”). Because the permanent injury threshold defense is available to Ms. Jiminez on remand and…
• Vera Saprounova Hopf, Complete Health of Tampa BAY, P.A. v. Robert Kaszuba, Polmed, P.A., 376 So. 3d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023)
• Bouchard v. Bouchard (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)
  …disqualify an agreed-upon guardian, 'the facts must be egregious, and the burden heavy. To do otherwise would invite any litigant who anticipates even a mildly unfavorable report by a guardian to seek the guardian's removal.' " O'Neill v. O'Neill, 812 So. 2d 448, 450 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (quoting with approval the legal standard applied by the trial court). The court must find that there is "bias or prejudice on the part of the guardian ad litem." Id. In this case, the court based its decision to disqualif…

Authorities Cited

• O'Shields v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 790 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)