WARREN-HUCKINS COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
WILLIAM ATKIN AND F. L. KNIGHT, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

Fla. | 1933-04-06
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
109 Fla. 331 Florida Supreme Court (1933) Caution
Also reported at: 147 So. 585 · 147 So. 907
Cited by 32 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final judgment herein and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is. therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court appealed from be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • B. A. Lott, Inc. v. Padgett, 153 Fla. 304 (Fla. 1943)
    …. Supp., 255. The scire facias was not defective because Baldwin was not made a party. Once the judgment lien attached Baldwin purchased subject to same. Eppes v. Dade Developers, Inc., 126 Fla. 353, 170 So. 875; State ex rel. Lehman, 109 Fla. 331, 147 So. 907. It is insisted that since the decree was not recorded in the chancery order book of the circuit court of Dade County it did not constitute a lien. Cited for this assertion is Bay View Est. Corp., et al., v. Southerland, 114 Fla. 635, 154 So. 894. W…
  • Eppes v. Dade Developers, Inc., 126 Fla. 353 (Fla. 1936)
    …e property purchased at said sale subject to his (Eppes’) liens and judgments, and that the law of the case as applied' to his liens had been previously adjudicated by the Supreme Court of this State in State, ex rel. Eppes, v. Lehman, 109 Fla. 331, 147 So. 907, that he (Eppes) filed notice of lis pendens when he instituted his suits, and that nothing in the [*356] nature of a multiplicity of suits was involved between him (Eppes) and the plaintiff, Dade Developers, Inc. On February 2, 1934, suggestion of…
    1 / 2
  • IN THE Matter OF: Levy of Alias Writs of Execution Against Prop. of Fla. Cities Fin. Co. v. Allen-Hanford, Inc., 158 Fla. 34 (Fla. 1946)
    …materially changed since the mortgage foreclosure, and that other things of material significance have taken place that affect said lands and their value. To support their contention, appellants rely on State ex rel. Eppes v. Lehman, 109 Fla. 331, 147 So. 907; Eppes v. Dade Developers, Inc., 126 Fla. 353, 170 So. 875; Orr v. Dade Developers, Inc., 138 Fla. 122, 190 So. 20; Lott, Inc., v. Padgett et al., 153 Fla. 304, 14 So. (2nd) 667; Stewart et ux. v. Gaines, 103 Fla. 268, 137 So. 794; and similar cases…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw