IRENE COLVIN, APPELLANT,
v.
J. BOYD ENWER ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A widow sought to enforce her dower rights in Florida land that had belonged to her deceased husband before his guardian sold it during his insanity. The court held that a guardian's conveyance of a lunatic's property does not extinguish the wife's dower rights unless proper proceedings are taken to specifically bar or relinquish those rights.
A guardian's deed conveying a lunatic's right, title, and interest in land does not itself convey or extinguish the dower rights of the lunatic's wife. The wife's dower rights are not affected by the mere conveyance of the lunatic's interest unless proper judicial proceedings are undertaken to specifically relinquish or bar those dower rights.
“such deed shall be effective to convey all the right, title and interest of said lunatic in and to said real estate”
This establishes the scope of a guardian's authority to convey a lunatic's property under Florida statute.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceE.J. Colvin, a married man, owned lands in Florida before becoming insane. While insane, Colvin's guardian conveyed the lands to third parties without…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Whitfield, P. J.
It appears that E. J. Colvin, a married man, after being seized and possessed of described lands in Florida, became insane and the property was conveyed to others by the guardian of the insane owner, the wife not in any way conveying or relinquishing her dower rights and was not a party to the court proceedings under which the guardian of the insane husband conveyed the lands. The insane husband having died, his widow brought suit to have her dower interest in the lands awarded to her. A demurrer to the bill of complaint was overruled. The defendants in effect pleaded that E. J. Colvin resided in Missouri, was there adjudged insane and a guardian for him was duly appointed; that the guardian was by the County Judge of DeSoto County, Florida, duly authorized to sell the lands and did sell and convey the lands in the manner required by law. The plea was sustained on argument and complainant appealed.
Under the statute a widow is “entitled to dower in * * * all the lands, tenements and herediments of which her husband died seized and possessed, or had before conveyed whereof she had not delinquished her right of dower as provided by law, which * * shall be and enure to her proper use and behoof in and during the term of her natural life.” Section 3629, Rev. Gen. Stats. 1920, Sec. 5493, Comp. Gen. Laws 1927.
The statutes provide that where inappropriate judicial proceedings a guardian of a lunatic shall be duly authorized to make a deed of conveyance of a lunatic’s real estate to a purchaser, “such deed shall be effective to convey all the right, title and interest of said lunatic in and to said real estate”. Sees. 3991-3997, Rev. Gen. Stats. 1920; Secs. 5913-5919, Comp. Laws 1927.
While under the statute a guardian may by deed duly authorize convey all the right, title and interest of a lunatic in his lands, such deed of conveyance does not of itself convey the dower rights of a wife of the lunatic if he be a married man. And in the absence of proper proceedings to relinquish or bar the dower rights of the wife of a lunatic, they are not affected by the mere conveyance of the lunatic’s right, title and interest in his lands. See Davis v. Hutton, 127 Ind. 481, 26 N. E. R. 187; 19 C. J. 521; Williams v. Courtney, 77 Mo. 587. See also Roan v. Holmes, 32 Fla. 295, 13 So. R. 339; Pingree v. DeHaven, 90 Fla. 42, 105 So. R. 147.
Reversed.
Strum and Buford, JJ., concur. Terrell, C. J. and Ellis and Brown, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Roan v. Geo. M. Holmes, 32 Fla. 295 (Fla. 1893)
- Pingree v. DeHaven, 90 Fla. 42 (Fla. 1925)