THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
ARLENE CAMPUSANO AND HIRIAM AYALA, RESPONDENTS
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
ARLENE CAMPUSANO AND HIRIAM AYALA, RESPONDENTS
813 So. 2d 301
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We grant the petition for writ of prohibition. The respondents commendably concede that the trial judge improperly reconsidered the disqualification order, and improperly attempted to refute the charges of partiality in the motion. Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So. 2d 440 (Fla.1978); State v. Schack, 617 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Accordingly, we grant the petition, withholding the writ in reliance upon the trial court abiding by our decision. This cause is remanded with directions to the Chief Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit to reassign this case to another trial judge.
Prohibition granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lynom v. State, 816 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…irst written report. Such a singular technical violation, standing alone, however, is generally insufficient to support an order revoking probation in this district. See Butler v. State, 775 So. 2d 320, 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). But see Bell v. State, 813 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Accordingly, we must determine whether one or more of the additional conditions were violated. Concerning condition fifteen, the clinical psychologist who treated Lynom testified that Lynom had four scheduled appointments betwee…
Authorities Cited
- THE Florida BAR v. Sanford Freed, 366 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 1978)
- State v. The Honorable Larry Schack, 617 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)