LEON L. BIVENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LEON L. BIVENS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
813 So. 2d 963
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3,850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA) review granted, 797 So. 2d 586 (Fla.2001).
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hernandez v. State, 230 So. 3d 509 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…propriate petition for belated appeal of [*510] the July 7, 2016 order. Accordingly, we deny as moot the State’s motion to dismiss. Affirmed. . A circuit court is without jurisdiction to extend the time for taking an appeal. Larrimore v. Moore, 813 So. 2d 963, 963-64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).…
Authorities Cited
- Fritz Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)