WILLIAM J. SERPAS AND D. H. MILLER, APPELLANTS,
v.
SWAN NELSON AND EDITH NELSON, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. | 1929-01-31
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
97 Fla. 126 Florida Supreme Court (1929) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ranger Realty Co. v. Caspar Hefty, 112 Fla. 654 (Fla. 1933)
    …St. Augustine, 91 Fla. 314, 107 So. 689; L. &. N. R. R. Co., et al., v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745; City of Bradenton v. S. A. L. Ry. Co., 100 Fla. 606, 130 So. 21; Hargim, Inc., et al., v. O’Bannon, 100 Fla. 755, 129 So. 918; Serpas v. Nelson, 97 Fla. 126, 120 So. 217;. Folsom, et al. [*662] v. Bank of Greenwood, 97 Fla. 426, 120 So. 317. See also State Railroad Tax Cases, 92 U. S. 575. , Tax levies are made by statute or by officers pursuant to authority conferred by law. Tax assessments are made b…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw