ARCHITECT JEFF FALKANGER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION; AND JEFF FALKANGER, APPELLANTS,
v.
BOCA DEVELOPERS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION; AND BOCA MARINA, LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court reviewed an attorney's fee award imposed as a sanction against a developer for abusing the class action notification and opt-out process.
The appellate court granted rehearing to correct its opinion regarding the propriety of the attorney's fee award, which was the sole issue on appeal and cross-appeal.
[1] A money judgment entered upon a settlement reached after mediation is entitled to the same res judicata effect as a money judgment entered after a trial.
[2] Settlements are governed by the rules for interpretation of contracts and are highly favored and will be enforced whenever possible.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA developer sued a lot owner for violating a rent-sharing provision, leading to a class action counter-claim. The trial court found the developer abus…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Settlement Agreement Interpretation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
On the appeal from the order denying relief from a judgment entered upon a settlement reached after mediation, we affirm. See BMW of N. Am. Inc. v. Krathen, 471 So. 2d 585, 588 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (“The offer ... did not involve a complex transaction. The terms were few and easi ly understood.
Thus, the omission of what is now claimed to be an essential term, cannot be characterized as a minor, inadvertent error.”), review denied, 484 So. 2d 7 (Fla.1986). A money judgment entered upon a settlement should not be given any less res judicata effect — simply because it resulted from a settlement and not from a trial — than would a money judgment upon a verdict. Cf. Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So. 2d 1884 (Fla.1986) (“Settlements, of course, are governed by the rules for interpretation of contracts.
Additionally, settlements are highly favored and will be enforced whenever possible.” [e.s.]); Lomelo v. Am. Oil Co., 256 So. 2d 9, 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971) (voluntary dismissal based on stipulation of parties sufficient to invoke res judicata).
As to the appeal from the partial summary judgment, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because the partial summary judgment does not dispose of all remaining issues. See Mendez v. W. Flagler Family Ass’n Inc., 303 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1974) (piecemeal appeal should not be permitted where claims are legally interrelated and in substance involve same transaction); S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97 (Fla.1974) (unless claims adjudicated by partial summary judgment are interrelated with remaining claims pending in the trial court, to be appealable order must dispose of all the issues or causes in the case); Gordon v. Omni Equities Inc., 605 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
GUNTHER, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- S. L. T. Warehouse Co. v. Wilmott Webb, 304 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1974)
- Mendez v. W. Flagler Fam. Ass'n, Inc., 303 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1974)
- BMW OF N. Am., Inc. v. Krathen, 471 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
- Lomelo v. Am. OIL Co., 256 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)
- Gordon v. Omni Equities, Inc., 605 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)