WALTER J. BRYSON PAVING COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
S. J. PENDLETON, DOING BUSINESS AS PENDLETON GRAIN & PROVISION COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
WALTER J. BRYSON PAVING COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
S. J. PENDLETON, DOING BUSINESS AS PENDLETON GRAIN & PROVISION COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
97 Fla. 156
Florida Supreme Court (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Love v. Brown Dev. Co. of Mich., 100 Fla. 1373 (Fla. 1930)…the money should have been returned. According to the facts brought out, plaintiff in error was entitled to a finding in her favor under the common count for money had and received by the defendant for the use of the plaintiff. Hawkins v. Garrison, 97 Fla. 156, 120 So. R. 209; Cox v. Grose, 97 Fla. 848, 122 So. R. 513; Peterson v. Howell, 99 Fla. 179, 126 So. R. 362; St. Johns Electric Co. v. St. Augustine, 81 Fla. 588, 88 So. R. 387; Cullen v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., 63 Fla. 122, 58 So. R. 182; Bishop…
-
Peterson v. Howell, 99 Fla. 179 (Fla. 1930)…raged whenever the law affords no other remedy, and where a court of equity would compel a defendant to repay to the plaintiff a sum of money which the latter has been compelled to pay for his benefit.” [*186] In Hawkins v. Garrison, 120 So. R. 309, 97 Fla. 156, the same principle is expressed by Mr. Justice Ellis, speaking for the Court as follows: “Such an action (for money paid by the plaintiff to the use of the defendant) is in the nature of an equitable remedy, liberal in form and favored by the Cour…
-
Harris v. Requa, 105 Fla. 312 (Fla. 1932)…t antedated the contract for deed, which he holds—that is to say, the Piper-Emmons-Requa contracts for deeds. See Latin-American Bank v. Rogers, 87 Fla. 147, 99 So. 546; also Peterson v. Howell, et ux., 99 Fla. 179, 126 So. 362; Hawkins v. Garrison, 97 Fla. 156, 120 So. 309. While the above two last cases cited are law cases it will be observed that Commissioner Davis, speaking for the Court in Peterson v. Howell, states that “such an action (for money paid by the plaintiff to the use of the defendant) is…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence