ALEXIS CONSEPCION LEIVA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ALEXIS CONSEPCION LEIVA, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
814 So. 2d 539
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order revoking probation. However, we strike the portion of the order finding that defendant violated probation by fading to pay costs of supervision and to participate in the domestic intervention program in order to conform the order to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. Smith v. State, 752 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
Affirmed as corrected.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Singleton v. State, 820 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…court’s finding that, the defendant violated probation by failing to pay the cost of supervision. Next, as the State properly concedes, the written order revoking probation must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. See Leiva v. State, 814 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Sellers v. State, 793 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Jefferson v. State, 732 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Therefore, this cause is remanded for entry of a corrected order striking the trial court’s findings that the defendant…
-
Dillard v. State, 855 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…s probation. We affirm the order revoking his probation but remand for correction of the written order. As the State properly concedes, the written order revoking probation must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. See Leiva v. State, 814 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Sellers v. State, 793 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Therefore, this cause is remanded for entry of a corrected order striking the trial court’s finding that the defendant violated his probation by failing four drug tests. Aff…
Authorities Cited
- Smith v. State, 752 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)