EDWARD P. WILSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2002-04-03
No. 4D02-616
STONE, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
814 So. 2d 1121 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice for appellant to raise his eighth claim in a timely petition for belated appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c).

STONE, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Erick Richardson v. State, 884 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
    …of denial does not demonstrate that the sentences for the predicate offenses were entered in separate proceedings. Accordingly, the order summarily denying this claim is reversed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. See Ford v. State, 814 So. 2d 1121, 1122 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(holding remand for resen-tencing was required on ground that appellate court could not discern from the record whether predicate convictions were truly sequential as resulting from separate sentencing proceedings). On rema…
    1 / 2
  • Cook v. State, 893 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
    …a prior felony.” Although the state adduced evidence that defendant had nine previous convictions, it failed to show that they complied with section 775.084(5). In this instance the convictions were entered on two separate dates. See Ford v. State, 814 So. 2d 1121, 1122 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (holding three previous convictions insufficient because “there were two different dates of adjudication”); Warner v. State, 798 So. 2d 885, 886 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (10 prior convictions “entered on the same date in the sam…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw