S. E. SPAULDING, APPELLANT,
v.
MRS. LILLIAN T. ALLEN, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1929-02-15
Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
97 Fla. 210 Florida Supreme Court (1929) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam

Per Curiam

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gillett v. Colson, 144 Fla. 377 (Fla. 1940)
    …Jax, 36 Fla. 196, 18 So. 339; [*385] 29 L. R. A. 416; Ex Parte Knight, 52 Fla. 144, 41 So. 786, 120 Am. St. Rep. 191; Rushton v. State, 75 Fla. 422, 78 So. 345; State ex rel. Davis, Atty. Genl., et al., v. Rose, et al., Fla. Real Estate Commission, 97 Fla. 210, 122 So. 225, text 231, and with a full discussion: State ex rel. Moodie, et al., v. Bryan, et al., 50 Fla. 293, 39 So. 929, text 949; State rel. Oglesby v. Hand, Sheriff, 96 Fla. 799, 119 So. 376, text 378; State ex rel. Terry v. Vestal, 81 Fla. 62…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw