BILL A. CORBIN, PETITIONER,
v.
BANKERS TRUST, DEENA BARBEE; RITA MYERS, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES, ASSIGNEES, LIENORS, CREDITORS, TRUSTEES, OR OTHER CLAIMANTS CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER OR AGAINST MICHAEL ALLEN BARBEE, DECEASED; UNKNOWN PERSON(S) IN POSSESSION OF THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY, IF LIVING; AND ALL UNKNOWN PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER AND AGAINST THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT(S) WHO ARE NOT KNOWN TO BE DEAD OR ALIVE, WHETHER SAID UNKNOWN PARTIES MAY CLAIM AN INTEREST AS SPOUSES, HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES, OR OTHER CLAIMANTS, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This concurring opinion discusses the enforceability of prenuptial agreements, particularly in cases involving young couples, and suggests the need for legislative reform to address potential inequities.
The concurring judge believes that prenuptial agreements should not allow young couples with limited assets to permanently opt out of statutory obligations like alimony or equitable distribution, especially when children are involved.
The parties, a young couple married in 1978, entered into a prenuptial agreement before their wedding. The wife was pregnant, and the husband expected…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner has failed to demonstrate any harm arising from the order sought to be reviewed which cannot be remedied on appeal from a final order. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
PETITION DENIED.
WEBSTER, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.