NESTOR A. GARCIA, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL W. MOORE, AS SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
NESTOR A. GARCIA, PETITIONER,
MICHAEL W. MOORE, AS SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
815 So. 2d 705
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Denied. See Comer v. Moore, 817 So. 2d 784, 785 (Fla.2001).
WOLF, KAHN, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gomez v. State, 984 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…o. 2d 1111 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (affirming denial of 3.800 motion because it was clear from the motion that the court chose not to exercise its discretion at sentencing). See also Miller v. State, 829 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Strehle v. State, 815 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Harriman v. State, 798 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Inclima v. State, 625 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (remanding in 3.800(a) proceedings where it was not clear whether the court had exercised its discretion or not). Becau…
Authorities Cited
- Comer v. Moore, 817 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 2002)