ORA E. O'BRIEN AND GEORGE W. O'BRIEN, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
v.
ALBERT R. BORRILL, APPELLEE
ORA E. O'BRIEN AND GEORGE W. O'BRIEN, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
ALBERT R. BORRILL, APPELLEE
97 Fla. 224
Florida Supreme Court (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nichols v. Nichols, 223 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed upon authority of International Realty Associates v. McAdoo, 1924, 87 Fla. 1, 99 So. 117; Smith v. Home Seekers’ Realty Co., 1924, 97 Fla. 224, 120 So. 324; Pratt v. Carns, 1920, 80 Fla. 243, 85 So. 681; Curtis v. Briscoe, Fla.App. 1961, 129 So. 2d 450 and Rood Company v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade County, Florida, Fla.1958, 102 So. 2d 139. HOBSON, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and Mc…