THOMAS A. IODICE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• State v. Baez, 894 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 2004)
  …55 p.m. prior to the detention. The supreme court found that Popple’s suppression motion should have been granted. Under that holding, Taylor’s suppression motion was properly granted. This case is virtually indistinguishable from Miranda v. State, 816 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), Alvarez v. State, 695 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), and the cases cited therein. In Miranda, the arresting officer observed a legally parked car in the back of an apartment complex parking lot at 5:00 a.m. in an area of prior…
• State v. Taylor, 826 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …55 p.m. prior to the detention. The supreme court found that Popple’s suppression motion should have been granted. Under that holding, Taylor’s suppression motion was properly granted. This case is virtually indistinguishable from Miranda v. State, 816 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), Alvarez v. State, 695 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), and the cases cited therein. In Miranda, the arresting officer observed a legally parked car in the back of an apartment complex parking lot at 5:00 a.m. in an area of prior…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Leroy v. State, 982 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
  …rty. See Williams v. State, 910 So. 2d 368, 371 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Where a person is lawfully present in an area known for drug activity, reasonable suspicion does not arise merely from the person sitting in a parked vehicle. See Miranda v. State, 816 So. 2d 132, 135 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). For purposes of the Fourth Amendment, a seizure occurs when, under the circumstances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person would not believe he was free to leave. See Golphin v. State, 945 So. 2d 1174, 1182 (Fla.20…

Authorities Cited

• Fritz Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)