JAY THOMAS ECKARD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Eckard appeals his re-sentencing for vehicular homicide, challenging a downward departure sentence of 84 months that exceeded the 60-month statutory maximum for the offense. The court reversed, holding that even downward departure sentences must comply with statutory maximum penalties.
No. A departure sentence, even if downward, must be within the statutory maximum sentence limitations provided in section 775.082. The trial court's authority to impose a downward departure does not permit it to exceed the applicable statutory maximum.
[1] A downward departure sentence must be imposed within any relevant maximum sentence limitations provided by statute.
[2] A trial court cannot impose a downward departure sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum for the offense.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a departure sentence must be within any relevant maximum sentence [*773] limitations provided in section 775.082”
Establishes the core holding that departure sentences cannot exceed statutory maximums
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEckard was convicted of vehicular homicide under Florida law. The sentencing guidelines recommended 111-185 months imprisonment. At re-sentencing, the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Downward Departure Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
PALMER, J.
Jay Eckard appeals his sentence which was entered by the trial court upon remand from this court.1 We reverse.
Eckard was found guilty of committing the crime of vehicular homicide, in violation of section 782.071 of the Florida Statutes (1997). The applicable statutory maximum for this offense is 60 months imprisonment. See § 775.082(3)(d), Fla. Stat.(1997). Eckard’s recommended sentencing guidelines range was between a minimum term of 111 months and a maximum term of 185 months incarceration. At the re-sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced Eckard to a term of 84 months incarceration followed by 100 months probation. Defense counsel immediately objected since the sentence was a downward departure sentence which exceeded the 60 month statutory maximum. See § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1997).2 Upon consideration of defense counsel’s objection, the trial court ruled that the sentence would stand as ordered and further stated on the record that the imposition of a downward departure sentence was warranted because mitigating circumstances existed at the time of Eckard’s initial sentencing; namely, the unsophisticated manner in which the offense was committed and an isolated incident for which Eckard had shown remorse.
Eckard argues that his sentence is illegal under section 921.001(5) of the Florida Statutes (1997). We agree. As the Second District held in Nunez v. State, 721 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) when presented with a virtually identical factual scenario, a departure sentence must be within any relevant maximum sentence limitations provided in section 775.082. Therefore, in deciding to impose a downward departure sentence, the trial court was required to sentence Eckard within the 60 month maximum provided by statute.
Accordingly, we reverse Eckard’s sentence and remand with instructions that the trial court impose a sentence within the statutory maximum.
Sentence REVERSED and case REMANDED.
GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur. . See Eckard v. State, 758 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
. Section 921.001 of the Florida Statutes (1997) provides, in relevant part:
921.001. Sentencing Commission and sentencing guidelines generally
(5) ... If a recommended sentence under the guidelines exceeds the maximum sentence otherwise authorized by s. 775.082 [which sets forth the statutory maximum sentences], the sentence under the guidelines must be imposed, absent a departure. If a departure sentence, with written findings, is imposed, such sentence must be within any relevant maximum sentence limitations provided in s. 775.082.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Nunez v. State, 721 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
- Eckard v. State, 758 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)