DANIEL CIFUENTES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-05-15
No. 3D01-2604
Before COPE, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
816 So. 2d 804 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Affirmative misadvice by counsel regarding potential sentence-enhancing consequences of a guilty plea does not render the plea involuntary.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant sought postconviction relief to withdraw a guilty plea entered in 1988, alleging affirmative misadvice from his counsel. The trial court den…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Cifuentes appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Although this involves a plea entered on October 26, 1988, the State does not eon- test the timeliness of this appeal pursuant to Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla.1999).

The recent supreme court decision in Major v. State, 814 So. 2d 424 (Fla.2002) left undecided whether affirmative misad-vice by counsel, as alleged in Cifuentes’ motion, could form the basis for withdrawing a guilty plea. There is a conflict in the districts on this issue. The Fourth District has held that such an allegation could form the basis for relief. See Jones v. State, 814 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Smith v. State, 784 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The Second District disagrees. See Home v. State, 792 So. 2d 581, 582 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), certifying conflict with Smith. We have aligned ourselves with the Second District in that when counsel misinforms his client of the potential sentence-enhancing consequences of his plea, it is a collateral consequence which does not render a plea involuntary. See Scott v. State, 813 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

We therefore affirm the summary denial of the motion for postconviction relief, and certify conflict with Smith v. State, 784 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw