HAROLD E. ROYCE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HAROLD E. ROYCE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
817 So. 2d 870
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2002)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
FULMER, Judge.
We affirm Appellant’s convictions for arson of a dwelling and violation of an injunction. We remand, however, for entry of a corrected probation order consistent with the trial court’s order, entered June 25, 2001, granting Appellant’s motion to correct a sentencing error. See Grove v. State, 784 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
Affirmed, but remanded for entry of a corrected probation order. CASANUEVA and SILBERMAN, JJ„ Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sarkis v. Allstate Ins. Co., 863 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 2003)…enhancement is required to obtain competent counsel, cannot be met because when an offer of judgment is made and rejected, counsel has already been obtained. This is the essential point made by the Third District in Amisub, Inc. v. [*224] Hernandez, 817 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), and quoted by the majority. Majority op. at 216-17. Rowe and Quanstrom, therefore, do not support a multiplier under the offer of judgment statute and rule. In her dissent, Justice Pariente relies on this Court’s decision in Bel…1 / 2
-
Holiday v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins., 864 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…ed the use of a multiplier to promote access to courts by encouraging lawyers to undertake representation at the inception of certain cases. We agree with the Third District Court of Appeal’s analysis in Amisub [American Hospital, Inc. v. Hernandez, 817 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)] that Quanstrom specifically refers to obtaining counsel in the first instance. It is self-evident that attorney fees awarded as a sanction under 768.79 and rule 1.422 are awarded after an attorney has already been obtained and ag…
-
Wesson v. Fla. Peninsula Ins. Co. (Fla. 1st DCA 2020)…mt., LLC, 969 So. 2d 1219 * Florida Patient’s Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985). (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (analyzing client’s ability to pay on an hourly basis when considering risk of non-payment); Amisub (Am. Hosp.) Inc. v. Hernandez, 817 So. 2d 870, 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (finding attorney mitigated his risk of nonpayment when attorney and client renegotiated their fee and cost arrangement after first trial ended in adverse directed verdict); Pompano Ledger, Inc. v. Greater Pompano Beach Chamb…
Authorities Cited
- Grove v. State, 784 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Walker v. State, 784 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)