SHEILA DISANTO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, APPELLEE
SHEILA DISANTO, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, APPELLEE
817 So. 2d 946
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because there was competent, substantial evidence to support the Commission’s findings of fact, we affirm. Botner v. State, Dep’t of Admin. Div. of Ret., 438 So. 2d 94, 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Division of Ret. v. Allen, 395 So. 2d 1192, 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Kennedy v. Wiggins, 368 So. 2d 454, 455-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sibbley v. State, 939 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…ffice citing this appellate case number. We are confident that the trial court will rule on the petitioner’s motion within thirty days of receiving it, as it appears to now have the necessary companion records to be able to do so. See Cook v. State, 817 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Mandamus denied.…
Authorities Cited
- Kennedy v. Ruby N. Wiggins & the Ret. Comm'n of the State of Fla., 368 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
- Division OF Retirement v. Allen, 395 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
- Botner v. State, 438 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)