LAURA EDWARDS TULLY, APPELLANT,
v.
CHRISTOPHER TULLY, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2002-06-06
No. 1D01-2966
BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
817 So. 2d 1055 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*1056] PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Klette v. Klette, 785 So. 2d 562, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (“Appellant’s failure to provide either a transcript or proper substitute, such as a stipulated statement of the facts, defeats the appellate court’s ability to review either the factual or legal basis for the trial court’s decision.”); Mead v. Mead, 726 So. 2d 865, 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); see generally Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw