MCCASKILL INVESTMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
W. S. GREEN, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1929-02-25
Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur., Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
97 Fla. 290 Florida Supreme Court (1929) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Upon the authority of Brett v. The First National Bank of Marianna, this day filed, the decree herein is reversed insofar as it decrees recovery of attorney fees. The decree is otherwise affirmed. The cause is remanded for appropriate proceedings.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hymie Swerdlin v. State, 142 Fla. 515 (Fla. 1940)
    …ons, the verdict and judgment rendered might be permitted to stand but under the rule prevailing in this State with reference to consistency in the charge and the proof, it must be reversed. Craig v. State, 95 Fla. 374, 116 So. 272; Rogers v. State, 97 Fla. 290, 130 So. 561; Sansbarry v. State, 5 Ala. Appl. 117, 58 So. 340. See also West v. State, 140 Fla. 421, 191 So. 771, the most receent statement by this Court of the general rule. Reversed. Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., concurs…
  • McCaskill Inv. Co. v. Green, 112 Fla. 634 (Fla. 1933)
    …Davis, C. J. After this Court had decided the appeal brought here in a foreclosure case under the style of McCaskill Investment Company v. Green, 97 Fla. 290, 120 Sou. Rep. 555, and had affirmed the decree appealed from in all respects except as to attorneys’ fees, the McCaskill Investment Company, as complainant in this suit, filed its bill in the Circuit Court of Holmes County to rescind the contract o…
  • Watkins v. Blackburn, 137 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1962)
    …it is noted that petitioner, accompanied by counsel, pleaded guilty to the charge. No objection was tendered during the trial proceeding. The claim of this alleged defect comes too late in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding. Rogers v. State, 97 Fla. 290, 120 So. 561. As to the claim based on the statute of limitations, we have held that habeas corpus cannot be employed to determine whether the statute of limitations has run. Horton v. Mayo, 153 Fla. 611, 15 So. 2d 327. The writ is discharged and…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw