CLIFFORD J. EHOUSE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PLEUS, J.
This is an appeal of a denial of a motion to withdraw a plea subsequent to sentencing. The trial court found the motion was untimely because the motion was not made within 30 days after rendition of the sentence. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(i). The appellant argues that the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) cancelled his gain time contrary to the trial court’s intent in sentencing him. This argument is not addressed to any error committed by the trial court or any misunderstanding by the defendant, but rather with DOC’s forfeiture of gain time.
We agree with the trial court that the motion was not timely. See Williams v. State (Fla. 2d DCA Apr.3, 2002). Additionally, the DOC had the authority to forfeit the gain time. Forbes v. Singletary, 684 So. 2d 173 (Fla.1996).
AFFIRMED.
THOMPSON, C.J., and SAWAYA, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Global Satellite Commc'n Co. v. Sari Sudline and Fernand Sultan, 849 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…rial court granted the motion for failure to state a cause of action, finding that there was no basis on which to hold Sultan personally liable on the contract, which he signed as a representative of Sudline. Discussion In Hartcourt Cos. v. Hogue, 817 So. 2d 1067, 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), the court stated that The determination of jurisdiction involves a two part inquiry. First, it must be determined whether the complaint alleges sufficient jurisdictional facts to bring the action within the ambit of secti…
-
Metnick & Levy, P.A. v. Seuling, 123 So. 3d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…8.193(l)(g), Florida Statutes (2012), “a person submits himself to the jurisdiction of this state by ‘[b]reaching a contract in this state by failing to perform acts required by the contract to be performed in this state.’ ” Hartcourt Cos. v. Hogue, 817 So. 2d 1067, 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (quoting § 48.193(l)(g), Fla. Stat. (1999)). “Failure to pay a contractual debt where payment is due to be made in Florida is sufficient to satisfy Florida’s long-arm provision that refers to contractual acts ‘required’ to…
-
Bohlander v. Robert Dean & Assocs. Yacht Brokerage, Inc., 920 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…nto a contract with a non-resident, or a showing that payment must be made in Florida. See Venetian Salami, 554 So. 2d at 502; Group One Enters., Inc. v. Publishers’ Representative, Inc., 899 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Hartcourt Cos., v. Hogue, 817 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); deMco Techs., Inc. v. C.S. Engineered Castings, Inc., 769 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). The due process requirement may be satisfied, however, when it is established that a non-resident defendant entered into a contract with a…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Forbes v. Singletary, 684 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 1996)