BERTUS MORRISON ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
OKEECHOBEE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1929-03-02
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
97 Fla. 296 Florida Supreme Court (1929) Caution
Also reported at: 120 So. 556
Cited by 49 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree in part but found error in the awarded solicitor's fee. The Court remanded the case to allow the chancellor to take testimony on the appropriate solicitor's fee based on the mortgage agreement.


Holding

Yes, the solicitor's fee awarded was erroneous. The Court held that the chancellor should take testimony to determine the correct solicitor's fee based on the terms of the mortgage agreement.


Key Quotes

“it seems to the Court that there is error in the said decree insofar as it allows a solicitor's fee of $9,940.00.”

Establishes the Court's finding of error regarding the solicitor's fee.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The case involved an appeal of a decree from a lower court. The appellants challenged the decree, specifically the solicitor's fee awarded. The Florid…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is error in the said decree insofar 'as it allows a solicitor’s fee of $9,940.00. Brett v. The First National Bank of Marianna; Brooks v. Roberts, decided at this term. It is ordered that the chancellor may take testimony of the complainants as to the amount of solicitor’s fees within the terms of the mortgage agreed by them, to be paid to their solicitor for his services and amend the decree rendered by substituting such amount so proven for the sum allowed in the decree appealed from. Decree affirmed in other respects.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (24 total)

  • …ll take the same construction in the Florida courts as its prototype has been given in the federal courts insofar as such construction is harmonious with the spirit and policy of Florida legislation on the subject. Kidd v. Jacksonville, 97 Fla. 297, 120 So. 556 (1929); State ex rel. Packard v. Cook, 108 Fla. 157, 146 So. 223 (1933). PERC concluded that the Board’s decisions not to rehire Disabato and Rydzik or to promote Eckstein were violations of Sections 447.501(l)(a)2 and (b).3 Section 447.-501(l)(b)…
  • L. B. McLeod Constr. Co. v. State, 106 Fla. 805 (Fla. 1932)
    …requirements of law. Even if it would be reviewable on certiorari there was no specific exception to the charge complained of here, either at the trial or in the motions for new trial. Unlike the case of Kidd v. City of Jacksonville, 97 Fla. 297, 120 So. 556, the material furnished in this case, gasoline and oil, were consumed in transportation and power facilities that were essential to the public improvement construction, and could not become a part of the public works' project, but such gasoline and…
  • Brand v. Fla. Power Corp., 633 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
    …the Florida statute will take on the same construction as placed on its federal prototype, insofar as such interpretation is harmonious with the spirit and policy of the Florida legislation. See, e.g., Kidd v. City of Jacksonville, 97 Fla. 297, 304, 120 So. 556, 559 (1929); Department of Envtl. Reg. v. SCM Glidco Organics Corp., 606 So. 2d 722, 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Department of Professional Reg., Div. of Real Estate v. Toledo Realty, Inc., 549 So. 2d 715, 717 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Pasco County Sch. Bd.…

Previewing 3 of 24 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw