ANTHONY B. BOYKINS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2002-05-16
No. SC01-1123
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur., PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.
818 So. 2d 500 Florida Supreme Court (2002)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in Boykins v. State, 783 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), based on alleged express and direct conflict with a decision of another district court of appeal. Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw