E.W., A CHILD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Espresso Disposition Corp. 1 & Rowland Coffee Roasters, Inc. v. Santana Sales & Mktg. Grp., Inc., 105 So. 3d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
  …court. However, even if Appellee had so argued, any purported unilateral mistake resulted from an inexcusable lack of due care on the part of Appellee’s counsel, thereby precluding relief under a theory of unilateral mistake. See Stamato v. Stamato, 818 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); BMW of N. Am., Inc. v. Krathen, 471 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Although Appellee argued mutual mistake, that argument was equally meritless as there was simply no evidence in the record of any mistake whatsoever by Appella…
• Suntrust Mortg. v. Torrenga, 153 So. 3d 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
  …ke Surprise II Condo. Assoc., 118 So. 3d 313, 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (holding no basis for relief from default judgment and resulting foreclosure sale where the mortgagee determined that it was not necessary to answer complaint); Stamato v. Stamato, 818 So. 2d 662, 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (“[P]laintiff s failure to ascertain whether the court had ruled is the type of inexcusable neglect which would bar relief....”); Nat’l Premium Budget Plan Corp. v. All Am. Assurance Co., 389 So. 2d 324, 325 (Fla. 3d DCA 198…
• K.S. v. State, 835 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …on. Id. at 873 (“A trial court may rely upon the same factors and reach a different conclusion as long as it articulates the basis for disagreeing with the recommendation.”); see also K.W. v. State, 818 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); E.W. v. State, 818 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); AW. v. State, 818 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); A.T. v. State, 819 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). In S.L.K. v. State, 776 So. 2d 1062, 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we indicated, however, that such placement, even where supported…

Authorities Cited

• C.T. v. State, 819 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)