ANDREW DONALD GUMBERG, CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
LORRAINE ABRUZZO GUMBERG, CROSS-APPELLANT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Offset cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This case proceeded on the former wife’s cross-appeal after the former husband’s appeal was voluntarily dismissed. We affirm the trial court’s ruling that the former husband was entitled to an offset of $74,600 against the $100,000 he owed to the former wife pursuant to the prenuptial agreement. With respect to the prejudgment interest, we reverse the trial court’s decision and hold that the former wife was entitled to interest on the $100,000 amount from the time of the February 2,1998 final judgment of dissolution, subject to the $74,600 in payments made. Also, the former wife is entitled to interest on that portion of the attorney’s fee award allocable to issues “regarding custody and best interests issues concerning the minor child,” with interest to run from February 2, 1998. We affirm all other points raised.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gumberg v. Gumberg, 866 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…is former wife’s trial counsel $23,000 for a portion of attorney’s fees incurred in an unsuccessful challenge to a prenuptial agreement. We reverse because the successor trial judge incorrectly interpreted this court’s opinion in Gumberg v. Gumberg, 818 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), where we affirmed an order denying the same portion of attorney’s fees. The trial court’s 2001 order under review in Gumberg was not completely clear as to whether the trial court’s “reasonable” fee finding of $127,562.54 was…