ROLANDO SANCHEZ, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2002-06-12
No. 4D01-1495
SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
818 So. 2d 684 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Nicarry v. State, 795 So. 2d 1114, 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding that “the breaking into a building or structure for the purpose of continuing an offense in progress [such as fleeing and eluding] is sufficient to establish burglary.”).

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Amer Khan Agard v. State, 942 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
    …hority to impose such a fee). Judgments and sentences affirmed; imposition of probation processing fee reversed and cause remanded with directions to the trial court to strike the fee and to enter a corrected probation order. See Rosales v. State, 818 So. 2d 684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). SILBERMAN and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw