AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE

Fla. | 2002-04-18
No. SC01-2344
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
819 So. 2d 704 Florida Supreme Court (2002)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court declined to consider out-of-cycle amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure submitted by the Family Law Rules Committee, finding that a prior decision addressing social security number confidentiality had mooted the primary purpose of the petition.


Holding

The Court declined to consider the out-of-cycle proposals at that time because the primary purpose of the petition—protecting social security number confidentiality—had already been addressed by a prior decision. The Committee may resubmit its proposals through regular-cycle procedures under Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c).


Headnotes

[1] An out-of-cycle petition to amend procedural rules may be declined if the underlying issue prompting the petition has been resolved by a subsequent court decision.

[2] A court may decline to consider procedural rule proposals when the primary purpose of the petition has been addressed by prior judicial action.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the Court declines to consider the out-of-cycle proposals at this time”

The Court's determination to reject the petition for out-of-cycle consideration

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Florida Bar Family Law Rules of Procedure Committee filed an out-of-cycle petition to amend the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure. The petitio…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

The Florida Bar Family Law Rules of Procedure Committee (Rules Committee) has filed an out-of-cycle petition to amend the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure. For the reasons that follow, the Court declines to consider the out-of-cycle proposals at this time.

After the Rules Committee submitted its petition, the Court issued Amendments to Florida Family Law Forms, 817 So. 2d 721 (Fla.2001), which removed the request for social security numbers from the specified family law forms. The Court’s prior decision addressed one of the primary purposes of the Rules Committee’s out-of-cycle petition, which was to protect the confidentiality of social security numbers of parties in dissolution of marriage proceedings. Because there is no longer a pressing need to consider the out-of-cycle petition, the Court declines to consider the remainder of the Rules Committee’s proposals at this time.

However, the Rules Committee may resubmit its proposals with its regular-cycle proposals submitted pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c). If the proposed amendment to Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Form 12.902(j) is resubmitted, the Rules Committee should provide legal authority for requiring a clerk of court to restrict access to public documents and for the concept that a form can create specified duties for a clerk of court and direct a clerk of court to perform those duties.

Finally, the Court has referred the proposed amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family-Law Forms 12.902(d) and 12.902(j) to the Court’s advisory workgroup on the approved family law forms. See Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure and Family Law Forms, 810 So. 2d 1 (Fla.2000).

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw