CHRISTOPHER THOMAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHRISTOPHER THOMAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
819 So. 2d 846
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Sheriff v. Moore, 781 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
ERVIN, BARFIELD, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Osterback v. L.E. Turner, 855 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…id not address the actual merits” of his complaint for declaratory and mandamus relief. As we have previously explained, an award of costs under rule 9.400(a) does not depend on a party’s ultimate success on the merits of a claim, Newell v. Moore, 819 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), and the merits of a claim need not be considered by the appellate court for a party to be eligible for an award of appellate costs, see Smith v. Department of Corrections, 797 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). It is sufficient if…
Authorities Cited
- Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Miller v. State, 781 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
- Harold R. Sheriff v. Moore, 781 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)