ERSKINE FLORENCE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ERSKINE FLORENCE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
819 So. 2d 939
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Bratcher v. State, 727 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Smith v. State, 574 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Wilkerson v. State, 376 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
THOMPSON, C.J., SHARP, W. and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Laina, 175 So. 3d 897 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)…r first determines that the vehicle’s registered owner does not possess a valid driver’s license.” We followed Smith in Hoover v. State, 880 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), Guffey v. State, 796 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), and Florence v. State, 819 So. 2d 939 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). In addition, the Fourth District followed Smith and Hoover in Morrow v. State, 903 So. 2d [*899] 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). No other district court of appeal has questioned or conflicted with the holding in Smith. Yet, in the pro…
Authorities Cited
- Bratcher v. State, 727 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
- Smith v. State, 574 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
- Wilkerson v. State, 376 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)